The Role of Duty In William Shakespeares Hamlet Essays -- Shakespeare

The Role of Duty In William Shakespeares settlementKilling a person is non something that anyone can defer lightly. In thestory of Hamlet, the uncle of the plays focus char titleer, Prince Hamlet ofDenmark, has murdered the princes father, stolen the crown, and weds hismother. The ghost of world-beater Hamlet generates to the prince and tells him that hemust avenge his murder. The play follows Hamlets take of penalize againsthis murdering incestuous uncle. The question thats left to the reader toanswer is whether or not the final killing of Claudius was an dally of dutyor desire for one-year-old Hamlet. Some may suspect that the reason he wentthrough with his act of penalise was because he wanted to, but the majorityof readers seem to survey to the conclusion that his final act was an act ofduty.Hamlets first thoughts on the retaliate he has to perform went as follows Ill wipe away all piddling fond records, all saws of books, all forms, all pressures past, that youth a nd observation copied there and thy commandment all alone shall live. (A1, S5,L99-103)This statement makes it perfectly clear that Hamlet views what he has to doas a job that he has to do for his father.In act 2, scene 2 Hamlet meets an actor who well displays intense emotionand passion on matters that have just come to his head. Hamlet askshimself in the soliloquy that followed if he was a coward for not terminate his task yet. This makes it obvious that killing Claudius isntsomething that Haml... ...on has resulted withLeartes and his mother both dead, and himself mortally wounded. Had hisquest of murder been for desire and not for duty, he wound have killedClaudius ahead any of this had happened. But since he had to first testthe ghost, and then delay to kill Claudius when he wasnt praying, Hamletends up dying in this scene, on with a host of others. On the slightlybrighter side, Hamlet finally gets the revenge his father needs.The answer to the question of duty or desire a rises another(prenominal) question. Ifwe arrived at the same circumstances as Hamlet, could we have actedquicker? Although it seems care Hamlet went about this the wrong waybecause everyone ended up dead, I dont suspect that there are many of usthat could have performed this still-villainous act at the drop of a hat.