Church And State :: essays research papers fc

Church and State     The theory of growth is at betting odds with the views of numerous religions, andm any(prenominal) people want to allow a unearthly view of creationism to be taught in the humanity school system. The foundation of phylogenesis is base upon the belief thatthe spring of all ordered complex systems, including upkeep creatures, can beexplained by natural laws without the initiation or interjection of God. Aperson who believes in the biblical model of creation is viewed by some non-believers as a naive, narrow-minded religious fanatic who is not willing to lookat the observable evidence with an open mind. Because the evolutionary idea oforigins has been so widely accepted by the scientific community, many people amaze reasoned that the creation model should be all jilted withoutfairly examining its claims. Even many Christians who assimilate deep rely and faithin the Bible have never really unsounded the claims of the creation account( McLean 11).     Over the past several years, a salient deal of controversy surrounding thecreation-evolution issue has been generated by scientists who have based theirclaims on the creation model and have been willing to let their reputationsstand. Creationists have openly requested that when the discussion of originsoccurs in the public school system, two the model of creation and evolution bepresented side by side.     Initially, scientists and educators who have accepted the theory ofevolution without question were reluctant to pay any serious attention tocreationism however, it has now become app bent that substantial numbers pool ofpeople are taking creationism seriously. Many evolutionists view this trend asa serious threat to the advancement of science and have vowed to do everythingin their power to stop the teaching of creation in the public school system.Most evolutionists now view creationism as nothing more than than a particu larversion of fundamentalist Christianity with no valid scientific content. Onehundred-fifty years ago such a theory for the origin and history of the earthand life would have been termed absurd. Today, however, those who reject theidea of hit-or-miss evolutionary processes being responsible for designing life andshaping the geologic features of the earth are termed religious, unscientificfanatics.     Today, throughout the industrialized world, the moment children are ableto respond to their environment, they are constantly bombarded with the doctrineof evolution. Faith in the biblical concept of creation by the hand of God isridiculed and rejected by the secular system of education. Humanistic thinkingwidely accepts evolution as fact, even though "The all-too frequent picture ofevolution as a progression from ameba to man, is, and always has been, utterly